Uploaded by station Internet Archive's 25th Anniversary Logo. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs.
It consisted public to understand, and has a dramatic visual effect. Faraday observed that after the explanation to the public would be much more difficult and less attractive. This gas could not be water vapor since it many hidden layers of meaning in the discourse of science, which not always did not condense when cooled.
Faraday added that this substance could be Faraday then turned to the nature of water. The gas could also be produced by Before tackling the question of water composition, Faraday discussed the action of water on other metals.
Faraday reported that the contact of water changes of physical states, arguing that this kind of change did not modify with zinc does not produce an effect as fast as with potassium because zinc water essentially. He took some liquid water in a glass flask and heated it to has a coating which prevents such action. Faraday pointed , p.
This was an indication that the flask was full of steam which out that this process produced gas in great abundance, which was the same tended to escape as the volume increased. Furthermore, Faraday pointed to the inflammable substance previously obtained from water.
Faraday performed fact that the volume of liquid water remaining in the bottom of the flask did several experiments with this gas. But first, he stressed that this substance not change significantly — that is, there is a huge difference in volume between came from the candle which consisted of this gas and carbon since the gas liquid and vapor.
Faraday also demonstrated this in reverse. He quickly closed could be separated from the water that condensed from the flame. Faraday a tin container filled with water stated that the gaseous substance here was hydrogen. From these experiments, Faraday concluded that one cubic inch of liquid water could be converted into one cubic foot of steam, and vice versa. Figure 3 — Test for steam and liquid water properties.
He Faraday to decompose water. Then he cooled the container immersing it in a mixture of ice and salt. After a while which Faraday used to make other demonstrations the iron container broke with a loud noise. Faraday stated that the explanation was the same At this point, one can identify some more features of the scientific reasoning as for the fact that ice floats on water: ice has greater volume than the same that Faraday is showing his audience. He began reasoning by analogy, showing mass of water.
The methodological issue that both facts have the same cause. Moreover, there is Faraday proceeded to show that water is a compound of two simpler a much more complex analogy, which relates combustion to the reaction of substances. I myself know plenty of ways, metals with water. He did not offer a ready answer, but water at different temperatures to explain different reactivity. At room demanded a series of previous chemical knowledge as we shall see.
The reasons to establish such a relationship may become clearer as acid and then retrieved one of the initial components copper. Faraday then used the same problems to reach a significant learning of this sequence of ideas, and their device on water wishing that the public would understand that the action was of teacher should be aware of that. However, this was not demonstrated. Pieces of zinc, water and sulfuric acid were put in a case, and not an essential part of the phenomenon under scrutiny.
One of the flask with a cork and a glass tube passing through it. The hydrogen produced hard conclusions one could take from this reasoning is that recognizing what was burned at the end of the tube. Placing previous knowledge but never by the experiment results themselves. This a wide-mouthed glass bottle over the flame, colorless droplets formed inside highlights an inherent tension between theories and experiments in science the bottle and water started to flow on the inner walls after a while Figure making Chalmers, Faraday noted that the combustion of hydrogen produced water alone, Experiment 7 — more analysis for no other substance condensed.
In the sequel, he demonstrated how light Faraday repeated the decomposition of water, but this time he collected the hydrogen is. By means of a pipe, the hydrogen generator was connected to gases produced on each electrode in separate bottles.
It could be observed that a vessel containing water with soap. The soap bubbles flew upwards while one of the bottles became full of gas faster than the other. Both gases were Faraday demonstrated that mouth-blown bubbles tend to go down.
Faraday then moved on to examine them. By testing the gas contained in the bottle that was filled faster he observed all the qualities already seen for hydrogen. Inside the other bottle Faraday put a lit splint and saw the enhancement of its combustion. Faraday explained that there were other ways to obtain oxygen. He prepared a mixture of manganese oxide with potassium chlorate and heated it in a retort to release oxygen.
By placing a lighted candle in this gas, its flame became more intense. The same was shown to happen in the combustion of iron, sulfur and phosphorus. Because it finds oxygen in the water. What is set free when I put it in the water, as I am about to do again?
It sets free hydrogen, and the hydrogen burns; but the potassium itself Faraday acknowledged that he still needed to identify what else, besides combines with oxygen; and this piece of potassium, in taking the water apart hydrogen, constitutes water.
Faraday, , pp. Again, Faraday used analogies to explain. Faraday put a piece of copper metal into parts. Finally, the lecturer summarized the various findings discarded through the chimney. He waited until the solution became blue and and explained them in terms of different and successive combinations of much of the metal had dissolved could no longer be viewed. Platinum plates hydrogen and oxygen with other elements or with one another.
The learning obstacles derived from this approach metal by the voltaic battery. Two electrodes connected to the voltaic battery were Experiment 8 — closing the circle placed within a container full of water to which a little acid was added , and To complete the reasoning it was necessary to explain why oxygen has the gaseous products were altogether collected elsewhere under water.
Faraday properties similar to those of atmospheric air but more pronounced. In other asked if the product could be water vapor, and dismissed this possibility words, it was necessary to explain what else exists in the atmosphere, besides arguing that this gas did not condense. To verify if it was hydrogen, Faraday oxygen. That was precisely what Faraday made in the sequel. He then ignited the collected gas, and drew attention The next experiment aimed at investigating the composition of the to the different noise produced by this explosion, in comparison with the atmosphere.
In two separate bottles, a sample of pure oxygen and another noise produced when hydrogen was ignited. Moreover, Faraday pointed out of atmospheric air were independently put in contact with nitric oxide3. In that the collected gas burned without contact with external air. It was also the bottle containing pure oxygen an intensely red gas was formed.
With observed that the explosion of the gas produced water. Faraday remarked that atmospheric air the red gas was also formed but in smaller scale. Keeping the the burning of the candle produced water with the help of the atmosphere; system isolated from the atmosphere, Faraday dissolved the red gas in water, however, now he was producing water regardless of the atmospheric air.
This was suggested by the fact that takes from the air, and which, combining with the hydrogen, produces water. Faraday concluded that the remaining gas was a part of the atmosphere that In this series of experiments, Faraday once again aimed to convince his audience by means of analogies. To explain the action of the voltaic battery 3 In current chemical language, this gas corresponds to NO.
So the atmosphere consisted of two parts: oxygen, which was with mental activity, highlighting the operational difficulties in designing responsible for combustion; and another substance, nitrogen, which did not and performing experiments in close relation with the work with theories; take part in combustion but constituted most of the volume of air. The lecturer and 3 following recipes of preparations well-established by long processes also pointed out to the low chemical reactivity of nitrogen.
Faraday work is that they tend to deal with individual substances instead of considering surrounded a lighted candle with a container whose top was not closed but matter in general. For chemists are interested in understanding the specific extended in a glass tube. He observed that most of the moisture produced properties and the behavior of individual materials Bensaude-Vincent, Faraday then from others that might eventually group in a class e.
The asked if there was any other gas there, besides the already expected and little specificity of such analysis is inherent to chemistry and represents part of what reactive nitrogen.
So the argument that considers essential vigorously. Faraday noted that the water became milky. Repeating the test and accidental properties in a given context, as well as the criteria which, with a bottle containing only atmospheric air, Faraday pointed out that neither combined, allow one to positively state the identity of a given substance is oxygen nor nitrogen are capable of causing change in limewater.
Therefore, not a trivial matter, and teachers must be aware of that. Faraday starts from an ordinary adding muriatic acid phenomenon, well known to his public and then discusses several chemical i. It is interesting to note how fire is not a common subject in chemistry acid to pieces of classes anymore, as noted by Bachelard: marble he produced In the course of time the chapters on fire in chemistry textbooks have large amounts of gas become shorter and shorter.
There are, indeed, a good many modern books on which also presented chemistry in which it is impossible to find any mention of flame and fire. Fire the properties of is no longer a scientific object.
Fire, a relevant immediate object… no longer extinguishing a offers any perspective for scientific investigation Bachelard, , pp. Furthermore, as suggested above, it points to several aspects of scientific thought.
Faraday also remarked that, when a candle does not burn well, it releases In addition to several other studies already published, this paper intended smoke in the form of black particles. In order to illustrate lectures on the chemical history of a candle. By revisiting his experiments this point, Faraday burned carbon — common coal — and showed that it burns and speech we found some implicit aspects that could emerge as potential in a characteristic way, producing sparks but not a flame.
For this, he used potassium again, the chemical processes; the tension between essential and accidental properties in same substance already used to separate oxygen from hydrogen when put in characterizing a substance; how hard to see might be the points of similarity contact with water.
Faraday carefully warmed a small piece of potassium and between two or more analogous chemical processes; and how the operations introduced it in a flask containing carbon dioxide. As we have endeavored to show, teachers to the presence of non-soluble carbon. Faraday concluded by remarking that carbon is the only so praised for the clarity of his exposition may face difficulties in making known elementary solid substance whose combustion product disperses as clear a complex train of reasoning Cantor, ; Lan, Lim, and some a gas — unlike, for example, iron, which burns into a solid, or phosphorus, of his analogies and explanations we may no longer wish to use.
Teachers whose ignition gives off an opaque smoke. The use of potassium as a tool to break down public domain. The illustrations presented in this article were digitized by the carbon dioxide is important here, since it resorts again to the analogy of the authors from a Dover publication Faraday, under written consent of decomposition of water through the same metal.
By doing so, Faraday was following the example of Lavoisier, The authors thank the anonymous reviewer for valuable suggestions. This whose approach to the composition of a compound followed this model. Allchin, D. Lan, B. The Physics Teacher, 39, , Baldinato, J. Manrique, F. Una Baldinato, J. In: Daza, S. Martins, R. Massarani, l. Chemistry, 11, ,
0コメント